* PHP-7.4:
Call zend_unregister_ini_entries() when unload extension loaded through dl() without MSHUTDOWN callback. Extensions with MSHUTDOWN should use UNREGISTER_INI_ENTRIES().
Due to former restrictions of the libcurl API, curl multipart/formdata
file uploads supported only proper files. However, as of curl 7.56.0
the new `curl_mime_*()` API is available (and already supported by
PHP[1]), which allows us to support arbitrary *seekable* streams, which
is generally desirable, and particularly resolves issues with the
transparent Unicode and long part support on Windows (see bug #77711).
Note that older curl versions are still supported, but CURLFile is
still restricted to proper files in this case.
[1] <http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commit;h=a83b68ba56714bfa06737a61af795460caa4a105>
(cherry picked from commit c68dc6b5e3)
As of curl 7.56.0, `curl_formadd()` is deprecated in favor of
`curl_mime_*()`, so we use the latter if available.
(cherry picked from commit a83b68ba56)
When we change back the bucket key on a class linking failure,
make sure to reload the bucket pointer, as the class table may
have been reallocated in the meantime.
Also remove a bogus bucket key change in anon class registration:
We don't actually rename the class in this case anymore, the RTD
key is already the final name.
We already changed the behavior for __set() in f1848a4. However, it
seems that this is also a problem for all the other property magic,
see bug #78904.
This commit makes the behavior of all the property magic consistent:
Magic will not be triggered for uninitialized typed properties, only
explicitly unset() ones. This brings behavior more in line how
non-typed properties behave and avoids WTF.
Closes GH-4974.
The "return" in the for loop should have been a break on the switch,
otherwise the result is just ignored... but because it prevents
evaluation of the other operand, it also violates the invariant that
everything has been constant evaluated, resulting in an assertion
failure.
The for loop isn't correct in any case though, because it's not legal
to determine the result based on just the second operand, as the
first one may have a side-effect that cannot be optimized away.
As far as I can determine, this is no longer a problem: We will
not try to remove the defining instructions (this is only done if
the value is known by SCCP itself) and we also only determine
non-refcounted values in this way, so it is not a problem if the
FREE is omitted.
Máté Kocsis