`zend_uchar` suggests that the value is an ASCII character, but here,
it's about very small integers. This is misleading, so let's use a
C99 integer instead.
On all architectures currently supported by PHP, `zend_uchar` and
`uint8_t` are identical. This change is only about code readability.
* Zend/zend_enum: make `forbidden_methods` static+const
* main/php_syslog: make `xdigits` static
* sapi/fpm: make several globals `const`
* sapi/phpdbg: make `OPTIONS` static
* sapi/phpdbg/help: make help texts const
* sapi/cli: make `template_map` const
* ext/ffi: make `zend_ffi_types` static
* ext/bcmath: make `ref_str` const
* ext/phar: make several globals static+const
(And any PECLs returning `zend_empty_array` in the handler->get_properties
overrides)
Closes GH-9697
This is similar to the fix used in d9651a9419
for array_walk.
This should make it safer for php-src (and PECLs, long-term) to return
the empty immutable array in `handler->get_properties` to avoid wasting memory.
See https://github.com/php/php-src/issues/9697#issuecomment-1273613175
The only possible internal iterator position for the empty array is at the end
of the empty array (nInternalPointer=0).
The `zend_hash*del*` helpers will always set nInternalPointer to 0 when an
array becomes empty,
regardless of previous insertions/deletions/updates to the array.
When a uint8_t is bitshifted to the left, it is actually promoted to an
int. For the current code this has the effect of a wrong sign-extension,
and the result will also wrongly become zero when insert_pos >= 32.
Fix this by adding an explicit cast.
Furthermore, the partial prefix byte mask was computed incorrectly: the
byte is already shifted so the mask should not account for the shift.
This reverts commit 94ee4f9834.
The commit was a bit too late to be included in PHP 8.2 RC1. Given it's a massive ABI break, we decide to postpone the change to PHP 8.3.
Using php_info_print_table_header() for "Foo: bar" looks odd and out of place,
because the whole line is colored. It is also questionable from a HTML
semantics point of view, because it does not described the columns that follow.
The use of this across extensions is inconsistent. It was part of the skeleton,
but ext/date or ext/json already use a regular row.
@cname currently refers to the constant name in C. However, it is not always a (constant) name, but sometimes a function invocation, so naming it as @cvalue would be more appropriate.
