When allocating enough room for floats, the allocator used overflows with
large ndigits/EG(precision) value which used an signed integer to
increase the size of thebuffer.
Testing with the zend operator directly is enough to trigger
the issue rather than higher level math interface.
close GH-15715
The destructor of generators is a no-op when the generator is running in a fiber,
because the fiber may resume the generator. Normally the destructor
is not called in this case, but this can happen during shutdown.
We detect that a generator is running in a fiber with the
ZEND_GENERATOR_IN_FIBER flag.
This change fixes two cases not handled by this mechanism:
- The ZEND_GENERATOR_IN_FIBER flag was not added when resuming a "yield from $nonGenerator"
- When a generator that is running in a fiber has multiple children (aka multiple generators yielding from it), all of them could be considered to also run in a fiber (only one actually is), and could leak if not destroyed before shutdown.
This was only partially fixed in PHP-8.3. Backports and fixes the case for both
initialized and uninitialized property writes.
Fixes GH-14969
Closes GH-14971
You cannot return or yield a reference to a nullsafe chain. This was
checked already in zend_compile_return but not yet in
zend_compile_yield.
Closes GH-14716.
is_zend_ptr() expected zend_mm_heap.huge_list to be circular, but it's in fact NULL-terminated. It could crash when at least one huge block exists and the ptr did not belong to any block.
* Fix prototype for trait methods
Fixes GH-14009
* Clenup do_inheritance_check_on_method()
Remove wierd checks and define the behavior by explicit set of flags
* Fix naming and indentation
---------
Co-authored-by: Ilija Tovilo <ilija.tovilo@me.com>
Fixes GH-13970
Closes GH-14105
We cannot validate at compile-time for multiple reasons:
* Evaluating the argument naively with zend_get_attribute_value can lead to code
execution at compile time through the new expression, leading to possible
reentrance of the compiler.
* Even if the evaluation was possible, it would need to be restricted to the
current file, because constant values coming from other files can change
without affecting the current compilation unit. For this reason, validation
would need to be repeated at runtime anyway.
* Enums cannot be instantiated at compile-time (the actual bug report). This
could be allowed here, because the value is immediately destroyed. But given
the other issues, this won't be needed.
Instead, we just move it to runtime entirely. It's only needed for
ReflectionAttribute::newInstance(), which is not particularly a hot path. The
checks are also simple.
In the test cases, the compiler bails out due to a fatal error.
The data structures used by the compiler will contain stale values.
In particular, for the test case CG(loop_var_stack) will contain data.
The next compilation will incorrectly use elements from the previous
stack.
To solve this, we reset part of the compiler data structures.
We don't do a full re-initialization via init_compiler() because that will
also reset streams and resources.
Closes GH-13938.
This fixes an edge case causing the GC to be triggered repeatedly.
Destructors might add potential garbage to the buffer, so it may happen that num_root it higher than gc_threshold after collection, thus triggering a GC run almost immediately. This can happen by touching enough objects in a destructor, e.g. by iterating over an array. If this happens again in the new run, and the threshold is not updated, the GC may be triggered again.
The edge case requires specific conditions to be triggered and it must happen rarely in practice:
* At least GC_THRESHOLD_TRIGGER (100) objects must be collected during each run for the threshold to not be updated
* At least GC_G(gc_threshold) (initially 10k) objects must be touched (decref'ed to n>0) by any destructor during each run to fill the buffer
The fix is to increase the threshold if GC_G(num_roots) >= GC_G(gc_threshold) after GC. The threshold eventually reaches a point at which the second condition is not met anymore.
The included tests trigger more than 200 GC runs before the fix, and 2 after the fix (dtors always trigger a second run).
A related issue is that zend_gc_check_root_tmpvars() may add potential garbage before the threshold is adjusted, which may trigger GC and exhaust the stack. This is fixed by setting GC_G(active)=1 around zend_gc_check_root_tmpvars().
Inside `zend_object_std_dtor` the weakrefs are notified after the destruction
of properties already took place. In this test case, the destructor of an anon
class will be invoked due to the property destruction. That class has a
weak reference to its parent. This means that the destructor can access
parent properties that already have been destroyed, resulting in a UAF.
Fix this by notifying the weakrefs at the start of the object's
destruction.
Closes GH-13613.
php_strip_url_passwd modifies url in-place. We cannot assume from
php_message_handler_for_zend that data is a temporary, modifiable string.
Fixes oss-fuzz #64209
Closes GH-12733
When redeclaring an overridden static property with a trait we're removing the
property from the class. However, because the property itself does not belong to
the class we must not free its associated data.
This issue is exposed by 9a250cc9d6 in PHP 8.3+ because duplicate static
properties in traits are no longer skipped, but redeclared.
Fixes GH-12468
The constant name is usually interend. Without opcache, compilation always
interns strings. Without opcache, compilation does not intern (new) strings, but
persisting of script does. If a script is not stored in shm the constant name
will not be interned.
The building of enum backing stores was missing a addref for the constant name,
leading to a double-free when releasing constants and backing stores of enums.
Fixes GH-12366
Closes GH-12405
When declaring the same static property with a doc block in a class and in a trait,
the doc block of the property in the class is leaked. While at it, possibly fix doc
comment for internal classes.
Close GH-12238
These tests intermittently crash asan. It might be due to some function invoking
dl(), which is known to crash lsan. It might also be something else, the version
of asan shipped with ubuntu 22.04 is flaky.
Addref to relevant fields before allocating any memory. Also only set/remove the
ZEND_ACC_HEAP_RT_CACHE flag after allocating memory.
Fixes GH-12073
Closes GH-12074
- GH-11958: DNF types in trait properties do not get bound properly
- GH-11883: Memory leak in zend_type_release() for non-arena allocated DNF types
- Internal trait bound to userland class would not be arena allocated
- Property DNF types were not properly deep copied during lazy loading
Co-authored-by: Ilija Tovilo <ilija.tovilo@me.com>
Co-authored-by: ju1ius <jules.bernable@gmail.com>
We transform the arrow function by nesting the expression into a return
statement. If we compile the arrow function twice this would be done twice,
leading to a compile assertion.
Fix oss-fuzz #60411
Closes GH-11632
Normally, PHP evaluates all expressions in offsets (property or array), as well
as the right hand side of assignments before actually fetching the offsets. This
is well explained in this blog post.
https://www.npopov.com/2017/04/14/PHP-7-Virtual-machine.html#writes-and-memory-safety
For ??= we have a bit of a problem in that the rhs must only be evaluated if the
lhs is null or undefined. Thus, we have to first compile the lhs with BP_VAR_IS,
conditionally run the rhs and then re-fetch the lhs with BP_VAR_W to to make
sure the offsets are valid if they have been invalidated.
However, we don't want to just re-evaluate the entire lhs because it may contain
side-effects, as in $array[$x++] ??= 42;. In this case, we don't want to
re-evaluate $x++ because it would result in writing to a different offset than
was previously tested. The same goes for function calls, like
$array[foo()] ??= 42;, where the second call to foo() might result in a
different value. PHP behaves correctly in these cases. This is implemented by
memoizing sub-expressions in the lhs of ??= and reusing them when compiling the
lhs for the second time. This is done for any expression that isn't a variable,
i.e. anything that can (potentially) be written to.
Unfortunately, this also means that function calls are considered writable due
to their return-by-reference semantics, and will thus not be memoized. The
expression foo()['bar'] ??= 42; will invoke foo() twice. Even worse,
foo(bar()) ??= 42; will call both foo() and bar() twice, but
foo(bar() + 1) ??= 42; will only call foo() twice. This is likely not by design,
and was just overlooked in the implementation. The RFC does not specify how
function calls in the lhs of the coalesce assignment behaves. This should
probably be improved in the future.
Now, the problem this commit actually fixes is that ??= may memoize expressions
inside assert() function calls that may not actually execute. This is not only
an issue when using the VAR in the second expression (which would usually also
be skipped) but also when freeing the VAR. For this reason, it is not safe to
memoize assert() sub-expressions.
There are two possible solutions:
1. Don't memoize any sub-expressions of assert(), meaning they will execute
twice.
2. Throw a compile error.
Option 2 is not quite simple, because we can't disallow all memoization inside
assert(), as that would break assertions like assert($array[foo()] ??= 'bar');.
Code like this is highly unlikely (and dubious) but possible. In this case, we
would need to make sure that a memoized value could not be used across the
assert boundary it was created in. The complexity for this is not worthwhile. So
we opt for option 1 and disable memoization immediately inside assert().
Fixes GH-11580
Closes GH-11581
