"Uninitialized" here means that the object was created ordinarily
-- no constructor skipping involved. Most tidy methods seem to
handle this fine, but these three need to be guarded.
This is an extremely weird function, but the behavior seems to be
intentional, and is quite clearly documented.
So we adjust the stub to also accept false|null as arguments. I
believe the implementation already correctly matches union type
semantics.
We should keep the value of bcmath.scale and the internal
bc_precision global synchronized.
Probably more important than the ability to retrieve bcmath.scale
via ini_get(), this also makes sure that the set scale does not
leak into the next request, as it currently does.
libc-client expects `TYPEMESSAGE` with an explicit subtype of `RFC822`
to have a `nested.msg` (otherwise there will be a segfault during
free), but not to have any `contents.text.data` (this will leak
otherwise).
Closes GH-6345.
In libc-client 2007f `data` is declared as `unsigned char *`; there may
be variants which declare it as `void *`, but in any case picky
compilers may warn about a pointer type mismatch in the conditional
(and error with `-W-error`), so we're adding a `char *` cast for good
measure.
The original fix for that bug[1] broke the formerly working composition
of message/rfc822 messages, which results in a segfault when freeing
the message body now. While `imap_mail_compose()` does not really
support composition of meaningful message/rfc822 messages (although
libc-client appears to support that), some code may still use this to
compose partial messages, and using string manipulation to create the
final message.
The point is that libc-client expects `TYPEMESSAGE` with an explicit
subtype of `RFC822` to have a `nested.msg` (otherwise there will be a
segfault during free), but not to have any `contents.text.data` (this
will leak otherwise).
[1] <http://git.php.net/?p=php-src.git;a=commit;h=0d022ddf03c5fabaaa22e486d1e4a367ed9170a7>
Closes GH-6343.
While OpenSSL 1.1 allows unconditionally setting the CCM tag length
even for decryption, some older versions apparently do not. As such,
we do need to treat CCM and OCB separately after all.
Christoph M. Becker