Before the fix for bug 48289 has been applied, the algorithm to
construct a Q-encoded-word has been optimistic, i.e. try to encode as
many bytes that *may* fit in the remaining space, calculate the actual
length of the Q-encoded word, and if it's too long, try again with a
reduced size. However, the fix for the mentioned bug replaced this by
a pessimistic algorithm, which always terminates[1] the for loop[2]
during the first iteration (which renders the following 3 lines as dead
code), and as such easily produces unnecessarily short encoded-words.
Instead the proper fix for the bug would have been to make sure that
`out_size` is always decremented, if the space isn't sufficient for the
encoded-word.
[1] <https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/php-7.3.0beta3/ext/iconv/iconv.c#L1421>
[2] <https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/php-7.3.0beta3/ext/iconv/iconv.c#L1360>
Newer MySQL versions are stricter about invalid values. Three issues
are fixed:
* Don't use negative values with ZEROFILL. ZEROFILL implies UNSIGNED.
* Use a legal TIMESTAMP value. TIMESTAMP does not accept a Unix timestamp.
* Specify BIGINT values as strings, to avoid overflows.
This is a cherry-pick of d2dc0a3291 from master.
There were two distinct issues here:
* $trend was compared against 'NULL' using !=, which does not work
as intended in the case where $trend==0.0.
* current_targets was declared as double(17,0), which means that
the fractional part was rounded, so that the same comparison in
SQL (rounded) and in PHP (not rounded) did not necessarily
match.
Please don't write mt_rand based tests, it takes ages to debug this
crap...
Add debug message for failing test parts
(cherry picked from commit a45169a6ba)
Show all unmatched errors when test failed
(cherry picked from commit 7015965254)
More possibly colliding libs to remove from the test image
(cherry picked from commit 3008ad1a49)
Remove colliding file from CI image
(cherry picked from commit 6220d21c34)
Fix typo
(cherry picked from commit 24517d82cf)
Whenever we return with `PSFS_PASS_ON`, we need to update
`bytes_consumed` to not mislead the caller. Instead of fixing the
respective `if` clauses, we eschew the early bail-outs to simplify the
code a bit.
Per bug #76651 these changes do not appear to work correctly in
some cases. As no immediate fix seems to be forthcoming, I'm
reverting these changes.
Revert "Fixed invalid free introduced by d6e81f0bfd (avoid keeping "invalid" pointer)"
This reverts commit 11507c0e1b.
Revert "Fix mysqlnd build without openssl"
This reverts commit 6c9db02ff7.
Revert "Fix VC compilation as variable size array is not supported"
This reverts commit f96df64cb2.
Revert "Fix MySQL 8 auth"
This reverts commit d6e81f0bfd.
According to the POSIX specification of `getgrnam_r()` the result of
`sysconf(_SC_GETGR_R_SIZE_MAX)` is an initial value suggested for the
size of the buffer, and `ERANGE` signals that insufficient storage was
supplied. So if we get `ERANGE`, we try again with a buffer twice as
big, and so on, instead of failing.
The checks can issue reads below and above the temporary buffer. A read
itself doesn't seem dangerous, but the condition result can be
arbitrary. Such reads have to be avoided. Likely this patch should be
backported.
(cherry picked from commit b053beee7e)
Basically, the algorithm to append a converted string to an existing
`smart_str` works by increasing the `smart_str` buffer, to let `iconv`
convert characters until there is no more space, to set the new length
of the `smart_str` and to repeat until there is no more input.
Formerly, the new length calculation has been wrong, though, since we
would have to take the old `out_len` into account (`buf_growth -
old_out_len - out_len`). However, since there is no need to take the
old `out_len` into account when increasing the `smart_str` buffer, we
can simplify the fix, avoiding an additional variable.
We must not ignore erroneous characters in mime headers, but rather let
iconv_mime_decode() fail in this case, issuing the usual notice
regarding illegal characters.
We have to cater to the possibility that `=?` is not the start of an
encoded-word, but rather a literal `=?`. If a line break is found
while we're still looking for the charset, we can safely assume that
it's a literal `=?`, and act accordingly.
Christopher Jones