[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
These changes have been made using string replacement and regex.
Will not be replacing all instances of CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only ones which are doable using very simple regex with least chance of failure will be replaced.
Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36405
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36405 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_microbenchmarks_01 0dcec5d852af05d7b24625a44b77318856114541
PiperOrigin-RevId: 626522246
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
Will not be replacing CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only a few - which fit into single - line regex will be changed. This would be small in number just to reduce the load later.
Replacing CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc could be done using Cider-V once these changes are submitted if we want to clean up later. Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36267
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36267 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_grpc_assert_02 3aed62610192ef9e46b2b25f215e694a4a6f6862
PiperOrigin-RevId: 623469007
Lets us sever the dependency between stats & exec ctx (finally).
More work likely needs to go into the *mechanism* used here (I'm not a
fan of the per thread index), but that's also something we can address
later.
This PR implements a work-stealing thread pool for use inside
EventEngine implementations. Because of historical risks here, I've
guarded the new implementation behind an experiment flag:
`GRPC_EXPERIMENTS=work_stealing`. Current default behavior is the
original thread pool implementation.
Benchmarks look very promising:
```
bazel test \
--test_timeout=300 \
--config=opt -c opt \
--test_output=streamed \
--test_arg='--benchmark_format=csv' \
--test_arg='--benchmark_min_time=0.15' \
--test_arg='--benchmark_filter=_FanOut' \
--test_arg='--benchmark_repetitions=15' \
--test_arg='--benchmark_report_aggregates_only=true' \
test/cpp/microbenchmarks:bm_thread_pool
```
2023-05-04: `bm_thread_pool` benchmark results on my local machine (64
core ThreadRipper PRO 3995WX, 256GB memory), comparing this PR to
master:
2023-05-04: `bm_thread_pool` benchmark results in the Linux RBE
environment (unsure of machine configuration, likely small), comparing
this PR to master.
---------
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
* ThreadPool benchmarks
These are nearly identical to the EventEngine benchmarks at the moment. We can consider removing the redundant tests from the EventEngine code and focusing on EventEngine-specific things (e.g., timer cancellation)
* rm unused header
* rm leak
* fix: moved dependencies
Mark D. Roth
