Built on #36862 which should be merged first.
Closes#36863
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36863 from ctiller:cgmem 9d45ced0b6f6b23ccb38974e139f6ba4315651a0
PiperOrigin-RevId: 644219306
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging - gpr_log
In this CL we are migrating from gRPCs own gpr logging mechanism to absl logging mechanism. The intention is to deprecate gpr_log in the future.
We have the following mapping
1. gpr_log(GPR_INFO,...) -> LOG(INFO)
2. gpr_log(GPR_ERROR,...) -> LOG(ERROR)
3. gpr_log(GPR_DEBUG,...) -> VLOG(2)
Reviewers need to check :
1. If the above mapping is correct.
2. The content of the log is as before.
gpr_log format strings did not use string_view or std::string . absl LOG accepts these. So there will be some elimination of string_view and std::string related conversions. This is expected.
Closes#36595
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36595 from tanvi-jagtap:regex_test_core_iomgr_transport b0836fda1c2aca0993891e0739ae99e7843fb767
PiperOrigin-RevId: 633456839
[grpc][Gpr_To_Absl_Logging] Migrating from gpr to absl logging GPR_ASSERT
Replacing GPR_ASSERT with absl CHECK
These changes have been made using string replacement and regex.
Will not be replacing all instances of CHECK with CHECK_EQ , CHECK_NE etc because there are too many callsites. Only ones which are doable using very simple regex with least chance of failure will be replaced.
Given that we have 5000+ instances of GPR_ASSERT to edit, Doing it manually is too much work for both the author and reviewer.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the appropriate
lang label.
-->
Closes#36440
COPYBARA_INTEGRATE_REVIEW=https://github.com/grpc/grpc/pull/36440 from tanvi-jagtap:tjagtap_iomgr_memory_usage a56570338e308e9bfcd9f16c265074e777c9d6e9
PiperOrigin-RevId: 628276606
Relands #34785, which was reverted in #34818.
The first commit is the revert. The second commit removes the gtest
dependency from the xds_server library, which should address the
testonly problem internally.
<!--
If you know who should review your pull request, please assign it to
that
person, otherwise the pull request would get assigned randomly.
If your pull request is for a specific language, please add the
appropriate
lang label.
-->
Why: Cleanup for chttp2_transport ahead of promise conversion - lots of
logic has become interleaved throughout chttp2, so some effort to
isolate logic out is warranted ahead of that conversion.
What: Split configuration and policy tracking for each of ping rate
throttling and abuse detection into their own modules. Add tests for
them.
Incidentally: Split channel args into their own header so that we can
split the policy stuff into separate build targets.
---------
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
Add a check that SEND_STATUS_FROM_SERVER and RECV_MESSAGE are not in the same batch.
This is necessary pre-work for #31204 and implements part of grpc/proposal#336.
Also eliminates fling instead of updating it:
My expectation is nobody has looked at this corner in many years
It's not a benchmark we want: concentrating on a microbenchmark that doesn't include a binding layer caused us to favor designs that emphasized a lightweight core at the expense of a expensive bindings. We should consider the whole.
Co-authored-by: ctiller <ctiller@users.noreply.github.com>
* Refactor end2end tests to exercise each EventEngine
* fix incorrect bazel_only exclusions
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* microbenchmark fix
* sanitize, fix iOS flub
* Automated change: Fix sanity tests
* iOS fix
* reviewer feedback
* first pass at excluding EventEngine test expansion
Also caught a few cases where we should not test pollers, but should
test all engines. And two cases where we likely shouldn't be testing
either product.
* end2end fuzzers to be fuzzed differently via EventEngine.
* sanitize
* reviewer feedback
* remove misleading comment
* reviewer feedback: comments
* EE test_init needs to play with our build system
* fix golden file test runner
Co-authored-by: drfloob <drfloob@users.noreply.github.com>
Craig Tiller